Daves de Azevedo Cordova

Academic Portfolio & Research

Econometric analysis of production function

Total Tillage explains almost all of the Production. A two-stage least squares method is used, where independent variables predict Total Tillage in the first stage, and the predicted value for Total Tillage is then used to explain Production in the second stage. These estimations confirm that Solow’s model (1957) is the most significant for explaining economic growth in Mato Grosso when considering TFP. More capital per worker, taken as land per worker, leads to higher production.

Table 6 - Multiple OLS Regression to Logarithmic Total Tillage with random effects

lTotalTillage
lTFP 0.370***
(8.43)
Peixoto de Azevedo-Guarantã do Norte -0.522
(-1.49)
lWAP 0.267*
(2.46)
Juara 0.841*
(2.46)
lAnnualInvestment 0.205**
(3.22)
Barra do Garças 0.878*
(2.34)
lCapitalStock 0.182**
(2.91)
Confresa-Vila Rica -0.238
(-0.65)
Tangará da Serra 0.888*
(2.54)
Água Boa 1.374**
(2.72)
Diamantino 0.622
(1.43)
Rondonópolis 0.676*
(2.49)
Cáceres -0.0716
(-0.28)
Primavera do Leste 1.441*
(2.55)
Pontes e Lacerda-Comodoro 0.932
(1.60)
Jaciara 0.578*
(2.00)
Mirassol D'oeste -1.186**
(-2.62)
year1980 0.594**
(3.01)
Sinop 0.422
(0.51)
year1985 0.460*
(2.22)
Sorriso 1.750***
(5.37)
year1995 0
(.)
Juína -0.455
(-1.82)
year2006 1.435***
(5.64)
Alta Floresta -1.323
(-1.44)
_cons -1.329
(-1.25)
N = 126

t statistics in parentheses. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Prob>chi2 = 0.0000. Source: BRASIL. IPEA, 2024a, BRASIL. IBGE, 2024b and 2024c . Elaborated by the author. Complete regression is located on ANNEX C.

Table 8 - Generalized 2SLS to Logarithm of Production with Random Effects

(1) lProduction
lTotalTillage 0.850***
(25.65)
_cons 2.487***
(7.38)
N = 126

t statistics in parentheses. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Prob>chi2 = 0.0000. Source: BRASIL. IPEA, 2024a, BRASIL. IBGE, 2024b and 2024c . Elaborated by the author. Complete regression is located on ANNEX C.

Table 9 - Coefficients of geographical production function in Table 7 multiplied by Table 8

Region Coefficient (Table 7) Total increment (Table 7 x Table 8)
Tangará da Serra 0.888* 0.7548
Diamantino 0.622 0.5287
Cáceres -0.0716 -0.06086
Pontes e Lacerda e Comodoro 0.932 0.7922
Mirassol D'oeste -1.186** -1.0081
Sinop 0.422 0.3587
Sorriso 1.750*** 1.4875
Juína -0.455 -0.38675
Alta Floresta -1.323 -1.12455
Peixoto de Azevedo e Guarantã do Norte -0.522 -0.4437
Juara 0.841* 0.71485
Barra do Garças 0.878* 0.7463
Confresa-Vila Rica -0.238 -0.2023
Água Boa 1.374** 1.1679
Rondonópolis 0.676* 0.5746
Primavera do Leste 1.441* 1.22485
Jaciara 0.578* 0.4913

t statistics in parentheses. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Prob>chi2 = 0.0000. Source: BRASIL. IPEA, 2024a, BRASIL. IBGE, 2024b and 2024c . Elaborated by the author.

The Kandir Law, in this framework, promoted a structural break which allowed a boom of growth. Consequently, institutional changes paved the way for the Kandir Law to achieve this boom.

Table 12 - Chow test made for structural break in the Production Function of Mato Grosso

Regressions All years until 1995 only 2006
n 387 247 140
SSR 216.1206918 132.6288977 79.812138
Chow statistics 0.253787885
P-value 0.00018983920
Economic conclusion H0 rejected, Structural break reached, Kandir Law modified production function

Source: BRASIL. IPEA, 2024a, BRASIL. IBGE, 2024b and 2024c . Elaborated by the author.

TFP during fiscal consolidation and after it is also different. Technology and other embodied factors in TFP are more present in the 21st century than until the 1980s. This also points out the constraint of Land Market leads to a more intensive production in technology, confirming the central thesis of a new trajectory for wealth generation in agriculture and cattle activities.

Table 17 - Chow test made for structural break in the coefficient of TFP

Regressions All years until 1985 only 2006
n 270 130 140
SSR 154.680624 69.334694 79.812138
Chow statistics 0.34320257
P-value 0.00182605962
Economic conclusion H0 rejected, Structural break reached, TFP is not equal during 1975-1985 and in 2006

Source: BRASIL. IPEA, 2024a, BRASIL. IBGE, 2024b and 2024c . Elaborated by the author.